Bitcoin.com AI logo

Devstral 2 123B

Devstral 2 123B is a 123 billion parameter model from Mistral AI optimized for coding and development tasks. Features advanced reasoning capabilities for software engineering workflows.

Added Dec 9, 2025

Model weights

Pricing

Auto routing · per 1M tokens
Input
$0.40
Output
$1.40

Specifications

Context window
262.1K
Max output
65.5K
Parameters
123B
Avg output (7d)
545 tokens
Longer than 51% of models

Benchmarks

Sourced from Artificial Analysis.

Intelligence Index

8.6

Better than 36% of models compared

Coding Index

31.3

Better than 38% of models compared

Agentic Index

2.3

Better than 29% of models compared

Agentic work

AutomationBench-AA

Workflow automation with guardrail penalties

3.1%

Better than 22% of models compared

AutomationBench-AA Tasks Completed

Fully completed workflows without guardrail violations

0.0%

Better than 8% of models compared

AA-Briefcase v1.1

Agentic knowledge work (Elo)

482 Elo

Better than 21% of models compared

GDPval-AA v2.1

Economically valuable tasks (Elo)

544 Elo

Better than 26% of models compared

Document reasoning

GDP.pdf

Professional PDF reasoning: all-pass rate

2.4%

Better than 16% of models compared

AA-LCR v1.1

Long context reasoning with updated grading

32.3%

Better than 31% of models compared

Reasoning

HLE

Humanity's Last Exam

3.6%

Better than 6% of models compared

IFBench

Instruction-following benchmark

38.1%

Better than 34% of models compared

CritPt

Research-level physics reasoning

0.0%

Coding

Terminal-Bench v4.0

Practical coding and terminal tasks

0.0%

Better than 16% of models compared

SciCode

Python programming for scientific computing

32.8%

Better than 12% of models compared

LiveCodeBench

Contamination-free coding benchmark

44.8%

Better than 51% of models compared

Math

AIME 2025

American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2025

36.7%

Better than 37% of models compared

Knowledge

MMLU-Pro

Professional and academic subject knowledge

76.2%

Better than 53% of models compared

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Proportion of correctly answered questions

20.8%

AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate

Rate of incorrect answers among non-correct responses

85.3%

Legacy benchmarks

GPQA Diamond (legacy)

Graduate-level scientific reasoning

59.4%

Better than 34% of models compared

Terminal-Bench Hard (legacy)

Agentic coding and terminal use

18.9%

Better than 59% of models compared

T²-Bench Telecom (legacy)

Conversational AI agents in dual-control scenarios

24.9%

Better than 28% of models compared

AA-LCR (unversioned / legacy)

Long context reasoning evaluation

32.3%

Better than 31% of models compared

GDPval-AA (unversioned / legacy)

Economically valuable tasks

2.2%

Last updated Oct 22, 2026

Artificial Analysis

Providers

Auto routing is available for this model. Explicit provider selection is not available.

Loading provider options…

Reliability

Last 3 days