Bitcoin.com AI logo

Claude Opus 4.8 Thinking

Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 with thinking enabled.

  • Reasoning
  • Vision
  • Native PDF input
  • Tool Calling
  • Structured Output

Added May 28, 2026

Pricing

Auto routing · per 1M tokens
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
Cache read
$0.50
Compare provider prices

Specifications

Context window
1M
Max output
128K
Avg output (7d)
974 tokens
Longer than 70% of models

Benchmarks

Sourced from Artificial Analysis.

Intelligence Index

41.8

Better than 93% of models compared

Coding Index

74.3

Better than 89% of models compared

Agentic Index

41.9

Better than 81% of models compared

Agentic work

AutomationBench-AA

Workflow automation with guardrail penalties

45.6%

Better than 60% of models compared

Harvey LAB-AA

Legal agentic work criterion pass rate

91.1%

Better than 65% of models compared

AA-Briefcase

Agentic knowledge work (Elo)

1321 Elo

Better than 71% of models compared

GDPval-AA v2

Economically valuable tasks (Elo)

1456 Elo

Better than 81% of models compared

Document reasoning

GDP.pdf

Professional PDF reasoning: all-pass rate

22.8%

Better than 79% of models compared

AA-LCR v1.1

Long context reasoning with updated grading

77.7%

Better than 78% of models compared

MLCR-AA

Medical long-context reasoning

45.6%

Better than 86% of models compared

Reasoning

HLE

Humanity's Last Exam

48.7%

Better than 95% of models compared

IFBench

Instruction-following benchmark

62.2%

Better than 73% of models compared

CritPt

Research-level physics reasoning

20.9%

Coding

Terminal-Bench v4.0

Practical coding and terminal tasks

21.7%

Better than 75% of models compared

SciCode

Python programming for scientific computing

54.4%

Better than 74% of models compared

Knowledge

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Proportion of correctly answered questions

48.8%

AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate

Rate of incorrect answers among non-correct responses

39.3%

Legacy benchmarks

GPQA Diamond (legacy)

Graduate-level scientific reasoning

92.0%

Better than 93% of models compared

Terminal-Bench Hard (legacy)

Agentic coding and terminal use

58.3%

Better than 98% of models compared

T²-Bench Telecom (legacy)

Conversational AI agents in dual-control scenarios

94.4%

Better than 93% of models compared

AA-LCR (unversioned / legacy)

Long context reasoning evaluation

77.7%

Better than 78% of models compared

GDPval-AA (unversioned / legacy)

Economically valuable tasks

47.7%

Last updated Oct 14, 2026

Artificial Analysis

Providers

Auto routing is available for this model. Explicit provider selection is not available.

Loading provider options…